Difference between revisions of "Developer Summit 2009/Abstracts/Quigley Labeled NFS"
From SELinux Wiki
JamesMorris (Talk | contribs) (New page: == Author == Dave Quigley == Topic == State of Labeled NFS Effort == Abstract == As the use of SELinux expands in Enterprise environments customers are requesting the ability to use S...) |
JamesMorris (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Topic == | == Topic == | ||
| − | + | Labeled NFS Community Involvement | |
== Abstract == | == Abstract == | ||
| − | + | Discuss the current status of the Labeled NFS work and ways to increase | |
| − | + | community involvement. For the last year the prototype of Labeled NFS | |
| − | + | has been stable and usable in certain environments. To expand the | |
| − | + | capabilities of Labeled NFS additional development and design work is | |
| − | + | needed in the areas of RPC security, interoperability, and standards. I | |
| − | + | would like to present several areas where members of the SELinux and | |
| − | + | greater security communities can increase their involvement and help | |
| − | + | progress Labeled NFS standardization and merger into the mainline Linux | |
| − | + | kernel. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
| − | + | ||
Latest revision as of 09:06, 2 July 2009
Author
Dave Quigley
Topic
Labeled NFS Community Involvement
Abstract
Discuss the current status of the Labeled NFS work and ways to increase community involvement. For the last year the prototype of Labeled NFS has been stable and usable in certain environments. To expand the capabilities of Labeled NFS additional development and design work is needed in the areas of RPC security, interoperability, and standards. I would like to present several areas where members of the SELinux and greater security communities can increase their involvement and help progress Labeled NFS standardization and merger into the mainline Linux kernel.
